A quick way to tell

A quick way to tell professional journalism from 3rd-class tabloids: Read the headlines. You don’t even delve into the story written there-under.

Practice] Yonhapnews vs. Pressian
Tell me which is which?

Reposting

"We need a whole new paradigm, a fresh concept, to develop this country. Ships and semiconductors were not Korean industries. We adopted those products from the outside. The way forward is to pursue technological innovations in a way that only Koreans can. We were conquered by Japan for 36 years. During the Korean war, so many people were killed. The result is a hungry, fighting spirit that other countries find hard to match. Our lab has worked 365 days for 15 years. This concentration and dilligence were really needed. Western cultures cannot understand and cannot endure the hardship. If we deveote ourselves for a few more decades, I strongly believe we wll develop into one of the most advanced countries in the world. This is my dream." Dr. Hwang

Are we all winners?

Those involved with Dr. Hwang seems to be not running out of their way as I first thought, but instead, they're on track of their own for the respective final goal lines. Now the case has been turned into a bowl of soup seasoned with individual interests; each pours in their "chemicals" and "additives" with their clone-gate scoop everyday, some of which never looks related to the essence of this case at all. This is why we believe, whatever Dr. Hwang’s investigation reveals before us, we’ll have something to learn at least; never the truth tho.

Science vs. Religion

Judge ruled against Intelligent Design … an argument against one thing cannot necessarily be interpreted as an argument for something else. For example, the fact that the fossil record is incomplete is not evidence that human beings must have been created in their current form. The world, in other words, is not a zero-sum, dichotomous one in which a vote against one candidate equals a vote against another.

Full story
Story by the Times

Quote of Day

"Just because scientists cannot explain today how biological systems evolved does not mean that they cannot, and will not, be able to explain them tomorrow."