Science vs. Religion

Judge ruled against Intelligent Design … an argument against one thing cannot necessarily be interpreted as an argument for something else. For example, the fact that the fossil record is incomplete is not evidence that human beings must have been created in their current form. The world, in other words, is not a zero-sum, dichotomous one in which a vote against one candidate equals a vote against another.

Full story
Story by the Times

Quote of Day

"Just because scientists cannot explain today how biological systems evolved does not mean that they cannot, and will not, be able to explain them tomorrow."