Patriot Games?
The economist, a British weekly journal, diagnoses, on its own, the recent stem cell research scandal Dr. Hwang has been involved in with some doses of lessons we might learn from the episode. I post extracts here and also the link to the full story(you might have to register to read the whole thing). In Britain, meanwhile, the government has been showing strong support to, while the general public doesn't seem to take issue with, the cloning research. The journal, however, quite often not rare, has been a "doomsayer" to most scientific breakthrorughs just arising on the horizon. Are they being generous this time?
Vocabularies to learn] twisted tale, once-feted but now-disgraced, salutary, critical scrutinity, inaccurate work, controversial, human cloning, scientists of becoming celebrities, fickle, hubris and vanity, nationalism and science, uneasy bedfellows, a scientific power, a fatally flawed piece of research, deluded scientific nationalism, Trofim Lysenko, a Soviet geneticist, Manhattan project
Quote of the day] “Nature does not bend to a scientist’s will, however much he or his audience may wish it might.”
The truth will out (extract from full story)
Compared with these dire examples of waste and destruction, Dr Hwang's mistake looks relatively modest. Those opposed to human cloning may raise a cheer or two that a great leap forward which they had feared seems not to have happened. But, as the Nazis discovered, denying reality just because you don't like it is equally foolish. Eventually, somebody probably will clone a human being. Just not, perhaps, in South Korea.
3 Comments:
So cloning of human is inevitable?
Reproductive cloning must be be banned, which is far far beyond simple ethical issues, of course. But for the purposes of curing, or discovering the treatments of, diseases like Alzhemimer's and Pakinson and others, the research should be going on, in my opinion. Hence the name "therapeutic" cloning.
By the way, how did you get the idea from the stroy posted here? Well...if something is inevitable, it's only made so by human needs.( I'm not talking of politics here) But we still have a choice, and still if it's inevitable...I don't know. I just want to say anything that's "currently" controversial shouldn't be allowed to go on, not even properly and carefully measuring its potents. That's where research get in.
Post a Comment
<< Home